Contact

CONTINUOUS NETWORK & SERVICE VALIDATION

Is your network delivering what you promised?

Validate network and service quality continuously from real distributed locations — and see patterns that individual incidents cannot reveal.

Keep your monitoring. Add the customer's perspective.

See Degust in actionExplore the technology
HERO VISUALProduct image, network visual or data visualization

NETWORK-WIDE VALIDATION

6% of your customers are experiencing the same degradation.

One complaint may be an individual problem. Continuous validation across many locations shows whether it is part of a wider pattern.

6%
affected

437 of 8,000 validation locations

≈ 5.5%

COMPARE THE RESULTS

What do the affected locations have in common?

Compare validation results from affected locations with a comparable group that does not show the same degradation.

AFFECTED

DEGRADED
RegionNorthern Germany
TechnologyDOCSIS
CPEFRITZ!Box
FirmwareX.YY
CarrierCarrier A
RouteRoute A

COMPARISON GROUP

NORMAL
RegionNorthern Germany
TechnologyDOCSIS
CPEFRITZ!Box
FirmwareX.YY
CarrierCarrier B
RouteRoute B

Same environment. Different carrier and route. Different validation result.

The comparison provides evidence for where the investigation should start.

REAL-WORLD EXAMPLE

Follow the evidence.

“The service feels slow.”
Expected pathLocationNetworkIntermediateService
Observed pathLocationNetworkDeviationIntermediateService

The service was not the only thing that changed. The network path changed.

Validation results and supporting network evidence can be examined in the same time context.

REAL PRODUCT

See what the operator sees.

Use real operational data and product views to connect the validation story with what an operator actually works with.
REAL DEGUST SCREENSHOTApproved product screenshot required
01Relevant validation result
02Context or comparison
03Operational finding

FROM SIGNAL TO ACTION

Turn individual validation results into an investigation.

A repeatable process connects measurements with context and comparable results.
01

VALIDATE

Observe the service from distributed locations.

02

QUALIFY

Evaluate the result in its relevant context.

03

COMPARE

Compare results under comparable conditions.

04

INVESTIGATE

Use the evidence to decide where to investigate.

EXPLORE

Apply the same validation approach where you need it.

Use the component for three equal solution areas, options or benefits.

Broadband & Fiber

Validate service quality from customer-side and network locations.

Explore Broadband

Mobile Networks

Validate voice, data and mobile services across distributed locations.

Explore Mobile

TECHNICAL DETAIL

Go deeper where technical evidence matters.

Use structured technical detail without turning every capability into a separate card.
ResponsivenessQualify latency and response behaviour according to the relevant environment.
DNSValidate name resolution while retaining network visibility even when DNS itself is impaired.
RoutingExamine network paths in the same time context as service validation results.
Quality of OutcomeAssess whether technical conditions support the expected service outcome.

Related insights

OPERATOR QUESTIONS

Questions network operators need to answer.

Problem-oriented answers provide useful guidance for people and clear context for search and AI systems.

How can an ISP detect service degradation before customers complain?

Continuous validation from distributed customer locations can reveal degradation as it occurs. Comparing results across locations helps determine whether an issue is isolated or affects a larger group. A platform such as Degust can provide this validation using distributed measurement endpoints.

Why can Internet feel slow even when a speed test is good?

Available bandwidth is only one part of service quality. Latency, packet loss, DNS behaviour, routing changes and short interruptions can degrade the experience while a conventional bandwidth test still looks healthy.

How can an ISP distinguish an individual customer problem from a wider network issue?

Validation results from many locations can be compared and grouped by relevant context such as region, access technology, CPE, firmware, POP, carrier or route. Shared characteristics among affected locations provide evidence for where investigation should start.

How can an ISP investigate whether degradation is related to a route or upstream provider?

Compare affected locations with similar locations using different network paths or providers. If degradation follows one path while a comparable group remains normal, that relationship provides evidence for further investigation without assuming responsibility before the cause is proven.

Why should service validation consider access technology and customer tariff?

The same measurement can represent different quality in different environments. Expected responsiveness differs between access technologies, while acceptable throughput depends on the subscribed bandwidth. Context is therefore necessary to qualify validation results correctly.

How can an ISP detect short intermittent broadband outages?

Continuous validation can capture short interruptions that may be missed by occasional checks. Results from distributed locations help show whether intermittent connectivity is isolated or part of a wider pattern.

How does packet loss affect broadband customer experience?

Packet loss can interrupt data delivery, increase retransmissions and impair interactive, voice or streaming services. Its effect depends on when it occurs, how long it lasts and which service is being used.

Can DNS performance make a fast connection feel slow?

Yes. Slow or unreliable name resolution can delay the start of websites and services even when available bandwidth is high. DNS therefore needs to be considered alongside latency, routing and service measurements.

See what your customers actually experience.

See how continuous validation can complement your existing network monitoring.
See Degust in actionTalk to us